
HINCH
V GLENNON
It was day one, minute one, of my trial for contempt of court.
I was heading for a date with Pentridge and a time in jail. I knew
it. And accepted it. And deserved it.
Despite what a judge would later say about me I was crucially cognizant
of how my trial could affect the later trial of a calculating, child-molesting
priest named Michael Glennon.
In chambers, privately, I sensibly, responsibly, asked my lawyer,
Jack Winneke (now Judge John Winneke) to immediately ask the judge
to have my trial postponed. I believed, justifiably, that publicity
from MY trial could unfairly affect the following trial of the child-molesting
priest.
A judge named Murphy (now dead) dismissed the postponement request
in thirty seconds. He virtually told me and Winneke: We are here
to try Hinch. Let’s get on with it. A Catholic, he even illegally
questioned me about my faith – or lack of it -- when I insisted
on an affirmation rather than an oath.
An Appeals court, ironically, later agreed with me and for a while
this grossly evil man, Glennon, used my argument about taint to
gain a brief freedom. The High Court, thankfully, put a sicko back
inside.
Flashback to a time in Hawaii. I was there, on holidays, when the
news was faxed to me that an Appeals Court in Australia had freed
this sleazebag on my own predicted grounds of prejudicial prior
publicity.
Because of Hinch, a court said, a child rapist was allowed back
on the streets. A judge excoriated me. An Appeals judge said I had
“permanently polluted the waters of the rivers of justice”.
A Sydney newspaper ran an editorial virtually calling me scum.
It suggested there should be some sort of code that stopped “journalistic
cowboys” like Hinch from being part of their precious code.
I was at an idyllic retreat on Kaua’i at the time when the
fax came through. And I nearly threw up.
I knew I had done nothing wrong. Nothing to besmirch a journalistic
profession which I treasured and respected. But it was the nadir
of my professional life. A professional life I have been in for
more than 45 years.
In print I was apparently some sort of irresponsible cowboy. That
hurt.
I was bolstered by letters and calls from Glennon victims. And,
sadly, there were heaps of them over the years.
Try this one:
“I was called to be a defendant witness during the trials
where you were incarcerated. You were painted as being an evil man
but, you were forgiven. I believed that you deserved what ever sentence
you received, and for this, I now apologise to you. I believe that
you have acted nobly and honestly at all times and respect you for
this. But, when the devil has a ‘silken tongue’ it was
very easy to be deceived.
I went to three camps with Glennon, that’s why I was called
as a witness. I must say that during the times that I went on camp,
it seemed to me that nothing untoward was going on.
I have talked to the mother of Glennon’s first rape victim.
The girl was ten years old. I have corresponded with one of his
young male victims. That trial was aborted in Glennon’s favour
when two young male victims threw up and ran out of the courtroom
under savage cross-examination
Michael Glennon has done more to stuff up my law-abiding life than
any person in my life. His perversions put me in jail.
It is bizarre but I went to jail before he did. And I am proud
of it.
The myth is that I thumbed my nose at the courts. Not true. The
myth is that Hinch did something drastically, legally, disgraceful.
Again not true.
It IS true I went on 3AW and named a priest who had been convicted
of sexual offences against a ten-year-old girl --the only time he
ever pleaded guilty. He had been in jail for that crime but was
still running a camp for kids in Lancefield. Often the only adult
there.
I have to be legally careful here but I know intimately of jurors
who have put Glennon away again. Thankfully, for a long time.
I have also talked on radio to a former Glennon cellmate who claims
the perverted former priest plans to kill me when he gets out of
jail.
Also, being deliberately obscure, I have had contact with a Glennon
juror. She said, in part:
“I have to say that I would love to know why anyone would
let someone who was convicted of raping a 10 year old girl in 1978,
coach an under 12s football team, Lalor Stars, and run the 'Peaceful
Hand Youth Foundation' in Melbourne's Northern Suburbs five years
later. I think in terms of prevention, no one did anything to ensure
Glennon would not be a repeat offender. I am glad though, that I
could have my say.
I would never have dreamed that representing the community in a
jury would be so satisfying. Even though the community has no idea
of what we actually achieved on Friday 8th August 2003, I am glad
that my opinion can actually make a difference. I'm sure if the
community knew the situation and Glennon's history, they would feel
the same sense of relief that I do.”
For me, all of this was 17 years ago. Senses and outrage get numbed.
When Glennon was convicted yet again recently I did not feel smug
or vindicated.
But, in a newspaper, radio and television career of more than forty
years, it was the most moral, correct, decent campaign I was ever
involved with.
I still believe if my twelve days in jail stopped one child rape
victim then who could ever say it was not time well spent?
October 26, 2003
.©Copyright
Derryn Hinch 2003
|